Many companies feel secure because they run regular backups. The data is backed up, IT has everything under control. But this is one of the biggest mistakes in data management: a backup protects systems - archiving protects the company. If you don't take this difference into account strategically, you risk increasing costs, growing dependencies and, in an emergency, even legal problems.
Why a backup alone is not enough
Backups have a clear task: they restore data if something goes wrong, for example after a server failure, a cyberattack, accidental deletion or a system error. They secure operational capability in the short term, but are not a strategy for compliance. What backups do not achieve is just as crucial: they do not offer audit-proof long-term storage, tamper-proof storage, structured record keeping or clear mapping of legal retention periods.
Archiving means the ability to provide evidence
Archiving pursues a different goal: it ensures that data is stored unalterably over the long term, complies with legal requirements, is documented in an auditable manner and is available in open, long-term readable formats. While backups are geared towards restoration, archiving is about verifiability and legal certainty - exactly what legislators and auditors require. It is not the question "Can you technically restore the data?" that counts, but rather: "Can you prove that this data was stored completely, unchanged and on time?"
The strategic mistake made by many IT organizations
In practice, confusing backup and archiving has serious consequences. Audit risks arise because backups do not provide structured evidence, which leads to a high level of manual effort and uncertainty. Old ERP or database systems remain active simply because historical data "has to be available somewhere", resulting in unnecessary licensing costs, increasing maintenance costs, security risks and blocked modernization projects. In addition, databases grow when historical data remains in the production system, queries take longer and IT optimizes symptoms instead of eliminating the cause.
Archiving as a strategic lever
A well thought-out archive architecture enables audit-proof storage, tamper-proof data storage, defined deletion and retention periods, self-service access for specialist departments and the decommissioning of legacy systems. This relieves the burden on productive databases in the long term and becomes an instrument for cost reduction, IT modernization, cloud exit capability, vendor independence and long-term governance.
The decisive change of perspective
The real question is not "Do we have a backup?", but rather: "Is our data archived in such a way that we can prove what we are keeping at any time in a legally compliant manner - and why?" Backup is IT security. Archiving is corporate security. If you think long-term, you need both - clearly separated and strategically implemented.
👉 Download the whitepaper now and find out why backup alone is not enough.